In Monday Morning
Roundup, Rand Fishkin writes:
Did anyone blog about Matt outing himself as GoogleGuy during SES? I believe
his exact words were "I backed into that position."
Nope, Rand — I was surprised about the lack of reaction and blogging to that myself.
I’m still doing post-show catch-up, but it hardly seemed to catch any buzz.
Perhaps one of the industry’s oldest secrets — Matt Cutts being GoogleGuy —
was no longer a secret to most any longer.
moderated the panel, and the confession came out when a member of the audience flat out asked Matt if he was GoogleGuy. Matt hesitated just a moment, and I could swear I could almost hear the
internal debate of "should I finally confess or not." And then he did, saying as
Rand notes that he sort of backed into being the GoogleGuy who posts on forums
and blogs. Matt then added that today, GoogleGuy might be one of many different
people from Google commenting in public areas.
Matt’s been blogging for
just over a year
now, and it’s been great to have him out under his own name. Personally,
while I love the Google Guy name, I sort of hope it gets retired. I’d rather have
Googlers taking part in conversations under their own names than through
anonymous handles. Plus, it would help avoid things where the named person might
comment on something they’ve also posted under an anonymous handle. As I
(At this point, you’re asking "Isn’t Matt Cutts GoogleGuy?" For the record,
Matt’s never publicly laid claim to being GoogleGuy. But since Matt’s more
active on commenting with things these days, I think it’s well time that
GoogleGuy step forward with a real name, so that if they are one and the same,
there’s isn’t confusion that two different people are talking.
Honestly, at some point we’ll have someone citing GoogleGuy, then someone citing
Matt against GoogleGuy, which is absurd if they are the same. I and many others
do know the real identity of GoogleGuy. I think it’s well time everyone knows
and hope GoogleGuy will step forward).