Tips for Google Site and Category Exclusion Tool
The 100 worst sites on the Internet: would you want your company's ads shown there? Solution: Google Content Advertising Site and Category Exclusion Tool.
The 100 worst sites on the Internet: would you want your company's ads shown there? Solution: Google Content Advertising Site and Category Exclusion Tool.
Targeting Google AdWords contextual advertising campaigns just got easier. This new tool keeps your ads from appearing in some pretty dodgy places online.
Google launched an important new tool that prevents your ads from showing on poorly-performing sites: the Category Exclusion tool.
Remember why content campaigns drain ad dollars? You waste budget because contextual ads appear on sites that are “poor quality,” meaning visitors to those sites are not likely to convert, even if your ads garner clicks.
We’ve discussed several strategies for controlling which sites carry your ads. The Category Exclusion tool simplifies the job by allowing advertisers to exclude whole swaths of site types.
To find the tool, click on Tools under Campaign Management. First you’re allowed to choose a campaign. Though you can choose search campaigns, you shouldn’t — the tool really only acts on keyword-targeted and placement-targeted content campaigns.
Having chosen a campaign, you’ll see the familiar site exclusion text field where you can type or paste the specific domain names of sites that shouldn’t carry your ads. But you’ll see two additional tabs: Topics and Page Types. Let’s start with Topics. Here’s an example of what you’ll see:
Here’s Google’s explanation for each of the topics that can be excluded:
Conflict and tragedy
Edgy content
But Google doesn’t trust its intuition, or yours, to lead to an intelligent decision about which site topics to exclude. The tool shows you, based on your campaign’s history, exactly what you’re risking by excluding sites within each topic.
In the example above, the advertiser would probably be wise to exclude sites in the crime topic, since the CTR (define) has been a dismal .52%, with no conversions. But the advertiser might think twice before excluding sites in the juvenile topic, since despite the poor CTR, clicks from that site are converting at a respectable 7.41%. Notice that cost-per-conversion data is also available, so advertisers can make sure their decisions are likely to result in acceptable ROI (define).
Let’s turn now to the Page Types tab:
Here the advertiser is presented with a range of page types that have traditionally yielded poor results for some advertisers. Again, Google’s explanation of each type:
Network types
User-Generated Content
This data is fascinating because it illustrates something I’ve been hearing from Google for some time: it’s not uncommon for pages/sites like parked domains (arbitrageurs) and error pages to yield good-to-excellent CTRs and conversion rates. In the example above, only social network pages yielded poor results, while the others produced results that rivaled the best search campaigns.
So, use the tool to further fine-tune your content campaigns — but watch out for these caveats:
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.