For a whole lot of really good reasons, brands (particularly those with resellers) maintain an ongoing battle to protect their brands. And in the online world, they want to hold search engines accountable. In today’s Searching for Meaning column, “Who Owns the Brand?,” Kevin Ryan notes that even if a group of advertisers did come together and pull their search advertising, all they will really accomplish is losing large amounts of directly accountable revenue by missing placements in top search sites. But Google is going to need the deep-pocketed advertisers currently being alienated by the lack of internal trademark policing. This could be a very large instance of mutual back-scratching, but the outcome will not be decided in court.
SEW Experts: Who Owns the Brand?
Want SEW higher in your Google results?Add as a preferred source
More in Industry
View moreGoogle wants travelers to book hotels without leaving Search
Hotels could keep the reservation and guest data while becoming more dependent on Google to bring customers back.
Google ordered to let rivals into its ad-tech walled garden
A federal court is making Google connect AdX and DFP to Prebid and let rival publisher ad servers access AdX demand. Publishers may have to wait up to 15 months for the doors to actually open.
SEO pricing: how much does SEO cost? (September 2026 Analysis)
How much does SEO cost? Compare SEO pricing, see what $500–$10,000 a month should buy, uncover hidden costs and calculate your break-even point.