Google today filed a 17-page response to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), accusing the government agency of causing delays that slowed down the Street View Wi-Fi data grab investigation and resulted in Google paying a $25,000 fine.
In its ruling, the FCC accused Google of “deliberately” impeding and delaying the 17-month investigation into Google’s collection of payload data (including emails, email addresses, user names, passwords, names, telephone numbers, addresses, and medical condition info) from Wi-Fi networks that weren’t password protected.
Google disagreed with the FCC’s ruling, noting that there were “two periods of silence — one gap of 83 days and another gap of 52 days — in which Google never heard from the agency,” Politico reported.
“As the FCC said in their report, we provided all the materials necessary for them to conduct their investigation,” a Google spokeswoman told Politico. “We agree with the FCC’s conclusion that we did not break the law, but believe that we did cooperate in their investigation, and we made that clear in our response.”
Google also shot back over FCC complaints that Google didn’t allow access to an engineer who wrote the program that allowed Street View to collect the data.
“The fact that the engineer was legally unavailable did not leave any significant factual questions unanswered,” Google wrote.
Mockery of Google’s $25,000 fine made it to “The Daily Show” last week, where Jon Stewart points out that “Google makes $25,000 in the amount of time it took me to say the words twenty-five thousand dollars.” He also got a good dig in at Google+ during the segment.
U.S. Congressman Ed Markey and the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) have urged for a larger investigation into Google’s Street View data collection. EPIC has also filed a Freedom of Information Act request to receive an unredacted version of the FCC’s Google Street View report.
Although Google appears to be clear of the Street View mess, the Federal Trade Commission is expected to fine Google for bypassing Safari’s privacy settings, possibly by mid-May, the San Jose Mercury News reported.
Related reading
The future of search
Will artificial intelligence (AI) ultimately make search better or worse? Is the future SERPless? And what are the ramifications for SEOs? Jessie Moore shares just a few of the key themes coming out of the plethora of predictions for the future of search
Where we’re going, we won’t need websites
As voice becomes dominant in search, and users turn to social media, apps and news aggregators for their content – and not to mention the rise in virtual reality – Kevin Gibbons asks whether we will still need websites in future.
Four ways Google is making SEO easier
One of the best ways to stay up-to-date with SEO and search marketing developments is to keep a close eye on Google's developments. However, just doing that can be a full-time job. Luke Budka highlights four recent updates you may not be aware of.
No need for Google: 12 alternative search engines in 2018
Here are 12 alternatives to escape your reliance on Google for all things search in 2018.
