The trial between Oracle and Google over the use Java software within the Android platform began in California yesterday with the selection of the jury that will hear the dispute between the two technology giants.
Today, the court heard video testimony from Google CEO Larry Page (recap via CNET) and in-person testimony Oracle CEO Larry Ellison (recap via CNET).
The two companies have been disputing the issue for over a year, with Oracle claiming Google wilfully refused to seek out a licensing deal over the use of the technology, which it acquired in its $7.4 billion purchase of Sun Microsystems.
“Oracle will prove at trial that Google deliberately chose to base its Android software platform on Java technology, seeking to develop and deploy Android rapidly and to capitalise on the large community of Java software developers,” it said in its court filing last year.
“Google’s documents confirm Google knew it needed a licence to do so, and when it could not get one on the terms it wanted, […] Google chose to take its chances and push forward with Java, helping itself to Oracle’s intellectual property without a licence.”
Ahead of opening statements, Oracle released a link to a 91-page slide deck outlining its case against Android, in which Oracle said it will prove that:
- Google decided to copy Oracle’s Java intellectual property for Android.
- Google did so to leverage Java technology and developer community.
- Google knew it needed a license to use that intellectual property.
- Google took no license.
- Google profits immensely.
- Google is liable for infringement.
Google argued that no license was required for the parts of Java used to write the source code for Android and that Google had the full support of Sun Microsystems, PCWorld reported.
Initially Oracle had requested damages in the billions, but this was later reduced and it is likely the firm will seek around $1 billion in damages.
Attempts between the two companies to settle their differences prior to a trial failed, with Oracle rejecting a $3 million offer from Google in March.
A defeat for Google could have a huge effect on its Android platform, which is already involved in several major lawsuits between rival firms, notably Microsoft, which has secured licensing deals with some of the major vendors using the platform, including Samsung.
Google also moved to purchase Motorola for $12.5 billion in order to shore up its patent portfolio and protect Android in face of the threat of further litigation.
This article was originally published on V3.
Related reading
How to optimize images for mobile: Implementing light, responsive, correctly formatted images
The mobile web has a weight problem. Too many mobile sites are slow to load, and bloated with unnecessary bells and whistles, leading to a poor user experience. This column explains how to make sure that any images on your mobile site are light, device-responsive, and use the best format to combine speed and quality.
Progressive Web Apps versus Android Instant Apps: Which is better for marketers?
Much has been made of the fight between mobile apps and the mobile web. But the line between the two is no longer as clear-cut as it used to be with the introduction of Progressive Web Apps and Android Instant Apps.
The ultimate guide to mobile technical SEO
Mobile is destined to become the backbone of determining rankings on both the mobile and desktop version of your website - so it's vital to look at technical SEO from a mobile perspective.
How to reduce the impact of images on your mobile site speed
With Google placing more and more emphasis on mobile site speed and user experience in order to achieve a good ranking, discovering issues with your mobile site speed is critical. But how can you fix those issues once you're there?
