By now you may have heard Google has purchased Motorola Mobility, the consumer electronics division of Motorola. In a $12.5 billion deal, Google agreed to pay $40 per share in cash, over 60 percent more than the stock’s value at the time. However, last week, the big question on everyone’s mind was Why?
Speculation began as soon as the news hit last Monday, rekindling all the old “Google phone” hardware rumors across the social stratosphere. It opened further discussions of what Google’s commitment to other manufacturers of Android devices and their commitment to keeping Android an open platform.
Through their press release and mini site, Google has certainly repeated their commitment to protect competition and the continuation to keep Android open source. There’s even quotes from Android OEMs, offering their support of the Google-Motorola Mobility acquisition. The quotes include principals from Samsung, HTC, LG, and Acer to name a few.
Amid all the speculation, Standard & Poor’s downgraded Google’s stock value to a “sell” rating for the first time in Google’s publicly traded history. The S&P changed that recommendation to “hold” yesterday. Throughout all the speculation the same, one-word answer to the question of why kept appearing: patents.
Motorola mobility has over 14,000 patents and another nearly 7,000 pending, all of which help protect Google’s Android mobile OS platform and all the Android hardware OEMs from the plethora of lawsuits filed by Apple, Microsoft, and others trying to gun down the Google juggernaut.
As Bloomberg reported, there are 18 specific patents Motorola Mobility owns that can help Google battle current litigation. These patents have already been used previously when Motorola Mobility “picked a fight” with Apple, issuing three lawsuits of their own. Those lawsuits targeted more than Apple’s iPhone. It also targeted iPad, AppleTV, and even the MacBook Air. Four of those 18 patents were also used against Research in Motion, resulting in the BlackBerry manufacturer to pay royalties, too.
If the patents and potential to stave off current and future lawsuits wasn’t enough, eWeek noted a few more interesting facts: Motorola is the leading manufacturer of set-top boxes used by major cable services. Google now has a new in to pushing GoogleTV more mainstream.
Google still needs to pass the Federal Trade Commission’s white glove test. The FTC antitrust probe of Google is already in the works. Will this impact what they do? Time will tell.
Related reading
Baidu: Can the search giant hold firm in China’s increasingly competitive mobile market?
A look at China's search giant Baidu. Against mobile-first Shenma, and potential for Google to enter the gray, can they stay competitive?
Q&A with SAP on digital transformation and search
Last week we spoke with Siddarth Taparia, SVP and Head of Marketing Transformation at SAP. He argues that digital transformation is preceded not by technology but by people, and shares what SAP is doing to ready themselves for the future.
Hey Siri, how do I responsibly invest in voice-activated technology at work?
Voice-activated technology is here and more accessible than ever before. Globant released a new report with data around the rise of voice, and how businesses can strategize for it.
Q&A with Adobe on the future of search
Prior to his panel discussion on Google, Amazon, Bing, Facebook, Pinterest, Twitter, and Adobe at The Transformation of Search Summit taking place in New York on October 19, we caught up with Pete Kluge, Product Marketing Manager at Adobe for a quick 5-minute preview.
