The FTC antitrust probe examining Google has moved past the initial stages. The investigation will now seek evidence to back specific claims and will delve deeper into key areas of Google’s behavior, including elements of search, Android, and Places.
The Practices Being Examined
According to sources quoted by the Wall Street Journal, the FTC now has a fairly clear idea of what they’ll be looking into. Here are the key areas of the probe:
- Google is unfairly promoting their own content above content of competitors on the SERP.
- Specific competitor sites are being unfairly demoted in or removed from the search index.
- Google prevents or prohibits smartphone manufacturers from using services that compete with Android’s or Google’s.
- Google Places took information from other review sites unfairly.
Google claims that they’ve done nothing wrong, but they’re “happy to answer any questions they [the FTC] have about our business,” according to a Google spokesperson. Still, certain allegations, if backed with proof, would be clearly damning, while many of the practices that Google admits to are in a precarious legal grey area.
The Real Questions
Now the FTC will be asking the important questions, with the biggest item being whether any competitors can prove their claims. Google will be given a chance to respond to any evidence against them, and the probe may end without a suit ever being filed against the search giant. In either case, though, the investigation is likely to take roughly a year – possibly well longer.
At the end of it all, we’ll have the answers to the real questions on how technology companies of massive size will be regulated. Here are the real questions:
Can companies take information that’s publicly available on the web and aggregate it using an opt-out only approach if those they’re pulling information from happen to be competitors?
Has Google gotten so big that they need to treat and rank their own links – including those in Google Maps, Places, and Shopping – from the same base level as links of competitors?
Is the use of Google as a deeply integrated default on Android a way of unfairly competing with alternative search engines?
As you can see, answers to these questions could apply to more than just Google. Other groups, most notably Apple and Microsoft, would suffer the consequences of the legal precedents if Google was restricted in any of these areas.
Related reading
What does visual search mean for ecommerce in 2017?
Since the early 2010s, visual search has been offering users a novel alternative to keyword-based search results. But what commercial opportunities does it offer brands today?
What will Google’s expanded policy on harmful content mean for SEO companies?
Google recently announced that it will be expanding its hate-speech policy for publishers that use the company’s ad network. How does this affect SEO companies, and what can we do to make sure we and our clients stay on the right side of the policy?
Pump the brakes: SEO and its sweeping statements
Search Engine Optimization is an imperfect science, and the sheer amount of sometimes contradictory information available about Google updates and SEO best practices has led to a tendency for knee-jerk reactions and sweeping generalizations among the community. Here's why you don't need to panic.
What do we know so far about Google’s new homepage?
Google has released a new, feed-based mobile homepage in the US, in perhaps the most drastic and significant update of its homepage since 1996. We take a look at what the relaunch entails, and how it might change things for marketers.
