In swift juxtaposition to the official opening of the U.S. FTC antitrust investigation, Google released a new version of their transparency report. The report gives additional levels of insight into government influence on censorship.
The Improved Report
Google released its first transparency report in September 2010 and since that time have implemented several new features, including real-time reporting and a new lineup of extras that focus on information regarding censorship. While some data on Google page properties being taken down was available previously, the new data shows the government influence in the removal of those properties.
Removed properties can be anything from a YouTube video to a Blogger blog to a Google Groups discussion to a single search page result, and many of the requests call for the removal of a large batch (as many as several thousand) of items. The new version of the report tells users how many items were removed, how many requests there were for removal, where those requests originated, and what percent of those requests were complied with.
Additionally, data on the requests is displayed in a plain English format. For example, users can see that 1,110 items were removed out of the 1,421 items requested for removal due to “Six court orders […] relating to a case of defamation against a man and his family.”
Certain removal data, such as that related to child pornography or copyright violations, are not displayed on the site.
Broader Insights on Government Actions
The report has allowed analysts to see which countries have requested the removal of information, their reasons, and their rate of success in working with Google. Some countries have a phenomenally high success rate. Germany, according to paidContent, is at the top with a 97 percent compliance.
But some countries seem to be striking out when it comes to requests, and Google is using the report to explain why. India has the lowest compliance rate, 22 percent, because the majority of requests involve an attempt to complete actions such as “remove a blog and YouTube videos that were critical of Chief Ministers and senior officials of different states.”
Users can find the report and explore the data here.
Related reading
The 4 scariest online marketing disasters and how to avoid them
As marketers, CEOs and managers we deal with too many fears daily: We have too many disasters to avoid. Let this article serve as a checklist to help you avoid some of the most unfortunate and embarrassing online marketing disasters.
Should Google be more transparent with its updates?
Most of Google's algorithm updates nowadays are unconfirmed and unannounced, leaving website owners and SEOs guessing as to what caused a change in ranking and what they can do to fix it. Does Google owe it to its users to be more transparent?
How well do you know Search Engine Watch? The SEW Friday quiz
Following the success of our previous Easter trivia quiz, we decided to mix it up again this Friday with another quiz - this time testing how well you've been paying attention to the content we've been publishing on Search Engine Watch this week.
What will the future of Google search results pages look like?
Recently, we took a nostalgic, infographic-based look back at the history of Google search results pages. In our follow-up infographic, we look into a future where context will define the form and content of the search results pages we see.
