In swift juxtaposition to the official opening of the U.S. FTC antitrust investigation, Google released a new version of their transparency report. The report gives additional levels of insight into government influence on censorship.
The Improved Report
Google released its first transparency report in September 2010 and since that time have implemented several new features, including real-time reporting and a new lineup of extras that focus on information regarding censorship. While some data on Google page properties being taken down was available previously, the new data shows the government influence in the removal of those properties.
Removed properties can be anything from a YouTube video to a Blogger blog to a Google Groups discussion to a single search page result, and many of the requests call for the removal of a large batch (as many as several thousand) of items. The new version of the report tells users how many items were removed, how many requests there were for removal, where those requests originated, and what percent of those requests were complied with.
Additionally, data on the requests is displayed in a plain English format. For example, users can see that 1,110 items were removed out of the 1,421 items requested for removal due to “Six court orders […] relating to a case of defamation against a man and his family.”
Certain removal data, such as that related to child pornography or copyright violations, are not displayed on the site.
Broader Insights on Government Actions
The report has allowed analysts to see which countries have requested the removal of information, their reasons, and their rate of success in working with Google. Some countries have a phenomenally high success rate. Germany, according to paidContent, is at the top with a 97 percent compliance.
But some countries seem to be striking out when it comes to requests, and Google is using the report to explain why. India has the lowest compliance rate, 22 percent, because the majority of requests involve an attempt to complete actions such as “remove a blog and YouTube videos that were critical of Chief Ministers and senior officials of different states.”
Users can find the report and explore the data here.
Related reading
IWD 2018: Eight SEO ladies give their advice on being a woman in search
In honor of International Women’s Day 2018, we wanted to highlight the perspectives of women working in SEO, and how – if at all – they think gender affects the industry and the work that they do. Search Engine Watch spoke to eight successful ladies in SEO to find out their thoughts and advice on being a woman in SEO.
Ranker: How to make a Google algorithm-proof website
Any SEO or webmaster who has ever had a website affected by a Google algorithm change – or feared being affected by one – has probably wished that they could find a way to make their website “algorithm-proof”. One site believes it has found the formula.
Mystified by martech? Introducing the ClickZ Buyers Guide series
Search Engine Watch sister site ClickZ has just launched the first report in its new series of buyers guides, which aims to to disentangle and demystify the martech landscape for marketers.
Pricesearcher: The biggest search engine you’ve never heard of
If you ask Siri to tell you the cost of an iPad near you, she won’t be able to provide you with an answer, because she doesn’t have the data. Until now, a complete view of prices on the internet has never existed. Enter Pricesearcher, a search engine that has set out to solve this problem by indexing all of the world’s prices.
