VeriSign’s New Site Finder Redirects Bad Domain Traffic

A longer, more in-depth version of this article is
available to Search Engine Watch members.
Click here to learn more about becoming a member

VeriSign is now resolving requests for non-existent .COM and .NET domains to an error page that features a search engine that it operates called Site Finder, a move that’s quickly raised controversy.

Previously, such bad requests would have resulted in an error that in turn would be handled in different ways by various browsers.

For example, consider a request for the non-existent web site. Entering that into Internet Explorer produces an error page saying, “We can’t find” The page provides an option to search the web using the Microsoft-owned MSN Search service. It’s also offers the helpful message, “Did you intend to go to one of these similar Web addresses?” with the correct site listed as a link.

You can still see the error message shown above in Internet Explorer because the domain I used in the example does NOT end in .COM or .NET. For those domains, a change that VeriSign made on Monday means you’ll be redirected to its search engine (if this isn’t yet happening for you, it’s because it will take a few days for the new system to fully propagate across the web).

The move, only days old, is already proving controversial. VeriSign is being accused of hijacking traffic, though who exactly “owns” the traffic to non-existent domains is entirely unclear.

Indeed, back when Netscape introduced “Smart Browsing,” it faced accusations from .COM domain owners that it was somehow robbing them of traffic. For example, prominent blogger Dave Winer at the time was disturbed that those entering just the word “scripting” were not resolved to his web site of My past story from that time, Netscape Smart Browsing Available, Debated, explains the situation in more detail.

Today, it’s Internet Explorer that dominates the browser marketshare. IE has its own mechanisms for dealing with bad domains or when a particular page no longer exists (my past story Searching & Navigating Via Internet Explorer covers this, though the RealNames system no longer operates). If anyone is being “robbed” by VeriSign, it’s Microsoft — yet Microsoft itself has come under accusations of somehow robbing people of traffic because of its own resolution systems.

In general, the main concern shouldn’t be on who owns the traffic but whether the user experience is being improved. VeriSign argues that it is.

“Like many registries, we are continually exploring how to enhance the internet user experience, and Site Finder does that for millions of users each day. And it reintroduces consistency into the mistyped domain name experience, since Site Finder is implemented uniformly regardless of the particular application,” said Christopher Parente, senior manager of naming and directory services with VeriSign.

I’ve been generally impressed with how Internet Explorer handles things. It remains to be seen whether VeriSign will live up to or exceed that standard. To get an early measure, I tried a few queries:

  • MSN failed but VeriSign succeeded in suggesting as a useful alternative
  • Both MSN and VeriSign succeeded in suggesting as a useful alternative
  • Both MSN and VeriSign succeeded in listing as a useful alternative
  • Both MSN and VeriSign listed the site as a useful alternative

Overall, VeriSign certainly appears no worse than what MSN was offering. My main disagreement is that the alternative addresses, presented under the “Did You Mean” heading, appear only after you see a search box. The same is true with MSN. In both cases, it would be better to flip-flop the order.

I do dislike that the VeriSign service feels more commercial than what MSN does. The VeriSign error page offers a “Search Popular Categories” option. Since it was navigational request that originally generated the page, rather than a search request, offering this type of suggestive sell to browse paid listings from Overture feels exploitive rather than useful.

While the user experience remains a main concern, the VeriSign move also has raised some other issues, in particular whether the change will have an impact on other internet aspects, such as how mail gets resolved and security issues. You can find a rundown about these issues in some of the stories below. The first two have some reaction from AOL and MSN, and the last ones touch on implementation issues.

Ultimately, it will be interesting to see how MSN and AOL respond. My assumption is that both parties might be able to configure their systems to avoid the new VeriSign errors pages, if they so choose.

I asked MSN if Microsoft could override what VeriSign but didn’t get a response to the question. Instead, MSN offered a general comment on the situation.

“MSN remains 100 percent committed to providing our customers with the most relevant search results. VeriSign’s decision to redirect traffic from misspelled queries isn’t of great concern to us, because the amount of traffic driven to MSN search through misspelled queries is insignificant. We are also focused on generating traffic from satisfied and repeat consumers rather than counting on mistyped query traffic,” said MSN product manager Karen Redetzki.

A longer, more detailed version of this article is
available to Search Engine Watch members.
Click here to learn more about becoming a member

Search Headlines

NOTE: Article links often change. In case of a bad link, use the publication’s search facility, which most have, and search for the headline.

VeriSign slammed for .com spam aid Sep 17 2003 8:50AM GMT
ComScore: Most Visited Site by Teens and Under-24 Sep 17 2003 7:06AM GMT
Setback for Microsoft Ripples Through the World Wide Web
New York Times Sep 17 2003 5:53AM GMT
Five common search engine mistakes
Computer Weekly Sep 17 2003 5:04AM GMT
No More ‘AOL’ for Time Warner
Washington Post Sep 17 2003 3:06AM GMT
Web Marketing Association announces winner of Web Design Awards Sep 17 2003 1:34AM GMT
SBC Yahoo Joins Anti-Pop-Up Crusade Sep 17 2003 0:07AM GMT
SBC Yahoo’s new look for fall
CNET Sep 16 2003 8:39PM GMT
Turn off the Internet!
Salon prem Sep 16 2003 5:14AM GMT
The online ad wars: Competitors snap at Google
ONE News Sep 16 2003 3:41AM GMT
Q&A: Federal privacy commissioner talks spam
ZDNet Sep 16 2003 1:50AM GMT
VeriSign Launches Service for Web Typos Sep 15 2003 10:11PM GMT
Google – the only archive we’ll ever need?
The Register Sep 15 2003 8:01PM GMT
The patent fight that could disrupt the Internet
ZDNet Sep 15 2003 4:41PM GMT
powered by

Related reading

Simple Share Buttons