Copyrights, Trademarks and Search Engines

Web site owners must be on constant guard with copyrighted and trademarked materials, both to make sure competitors don’t “borrow” content and to avoid provoking search engines in legal gray areas.

A special report from the Search Engine Strategies conference, August 8-11, 2005, San Jose, CA.

A longer version of this story for Search Engine Watch members goes into more detail about various methods to protect your intellectual content, including how to safeguard images from being copied, and a checklist for taking action if you’ve found that your content has been stolen and illicitly used elsewhere on the web.Click here to learn more about becoming a member.

A panel of experts debated a number of hot legal issues during the Copyrights & Trademarks panel at SES. How can web site owners get links to material infringing their copyrighted materials out of search engine results? What recourse do web site owners have if their sites were removed unfairly from search engine results due to an unfair or unfounded accusation of copyright infringement?

Do web site owners have trademark protection rights and responsibilities in search engine advertisements? This session explored these and many other issues, in particular looking at some recent rulings and existing search engine policies.

Search engines & meta tags

Even though few search engines use meta-tag content to determine relevancy, using another entity’s copyrighted or trademarked material is still problematic. “Some search engines, especially second-tier search engines, are still using the description information to publish what’s in those web sites,” said Eric Goldman, Assistant Professor of Law at Marquette University’s School of Law. “Taking the metadata from another site with trademarked terms is not only a problem from a legal perspective, but also from a search engine marketer’s perspective.”

“It could be problematic if a trademarked term shows up in the actual search results, and the site is also similar in its domain name to the trademarked web site to create confusion,” Goldman continued. “It still has to be a concern from what is being published in the search results.”

“Using someone else’s trademark in the metadata, even if it didn’t affect the ranking in the search engines, could still be considered infringement,” added Matt Naeger, Vice President and General Counsel at IMPAQT. “We have a lot of companies who would still treat this as significant, even if it is not from an operational standpoint.”

Web site owners should be careful about using other company names in their meta tags because some commonly used words are actually legally protected. “Terms which are made-up words are very strong trademarks, like a Xerox,” said Debbie Wilcox an intellectual property attorney at Baker & Hostetler LLP.

Paid site content

Sometimes web site owners use content from other web sites. “Friendly” sites might contain a link back to the URL with the original content and believe that alleviates their burden of possible copyright infringement. “Unfriendly” sites are ones that use other content that’s not their own to improve their own search engine optimization (SEO) rankings or to generate revenue from Google’s AdSense, usually without proper authorship attribution.

“Friendly” sites are no less liable than unfriendly sites. “Attribution to the original content source has no impact on potential liability,” said Naeger. “If this were copyright infringement, then the attribution would be irrelevant.” Before reproducing an author’s material, make sure you have permission to reproduce it from the person (or company) who owns the copyright.

RSS feed content is no exception. “People use my RSS feeds to pull in the full content to their own pages for their own AdSense [revenue”,” explained Jennifer Slegg of, who is experienced with enforcing legal copyrights. “I run AdSense up on my own site. So my AdSense is up on their sites with their AdSense ads, which puts me in violation of AdSense terms. These are people that want freebie content and try to get away with stealing it.”

“You can set up an RSS feed that only puts out summarized content. But we don’t have resolution yet on what are those rights—are they broad or are they individual?” said Goldman. “There are those who will say that by having your content posted in an RSS feed, you are giving others the right to go and grab that content for their own sites.”

“Until we get resolution, there is a lot of room for ambiguity,” he said. “Until we get clarity, there’s a lot of room for that to happen.”

Trademarks in paid search advertising

While a judge’s opinion had originally ruled that the sale of trademarked terms as keywords was lawful (in the GEICO case), the lingering issue was the usage of trademark terms in ad text by the search engines. This issue might be going through appeals and cases in other courts dealing with the different aspects of trademark law. Search advertisers should not think that they won’t be suspect to a suit themselves just because only the search engines have been the only ones targeted.

“Advertisers themselves could always be challenged by the trademark owner with purchasing trademarked keywords,” said Naeger.

“Despite what Google or Yahoo’s own policy or actions, that doesn’t stop you from taking action against the advertiser with a cease and desist,” added Goldman.

“I just go right to the cease-and-desist letter every time,” said Slegg. “If you try sending a friendly email, they don’t always take it seriously. My objective when sending a cease-and-desist letter is not to get monetary damages. It is just to have the infringers remove my content. I am quite happy to have it end there.”

“Cease-and-desist letters look pretty good on their face,” said Wilcox, “but when you send a letter you have to decide if you really want to get involved in litigation.”

“When you send a letter citing infringement, depending on how it is worded, it can open the door for a lawsuit against you,” she added. “So you have to be careful about who you send it to and what you are accusing them of. In a very clear-cut case, all you may need to do is send a letter and just carefully refine a couple of terms.”

Grant Crowell is the CEO and Creative Director of Grantastic Designs, Inc., a full-service search engine marketing, web site design, and usability firm.

A longer version of this story for Search Engine Watch members goes into more detail about various methods to protect your intellectual content, including how to safeguard images from being copied, and a checklist for taking action if you’ve found that your content has been stolen and illicitly used elsewhere on the web.Click here to learn more about becoming a member.

Search Headlines

NOTE: Article links often change. In case of a bad link, use the publication’s search facility, which most have, and search for the headline.

Throwing the Books at Google
Wired News Oct 20 2005 7:33AM GMT
Yahoo: Brand, Search Ads Mixing
Mediaweek Oct 20 2005 7:11AM GMT
Return to sender: Google forced by UK minnow to drop ‘gmail’ brand
The Times Oct 20 2005 6:22AM GMT
Google Preparing Librarian Center
BookwireLjdigital Oct 20 2005 5:31AM GMT
Yahoo Buys Whereonearth To Boost Local Search
Information Week Oct 19 2005 10:05PM GMT
Google Updates its Index
Search Engine Guide Oct 19 2005 9:41PM GMT
Publishers sue Google over book search project
CNET Oct 19 2005 9:36PM GMT
Google Earth Digs Deeper
San Jose Mercury News Oct 19 2005 9:33PM GMT
Top 20 Search Engine Helpers
SearchViews Oct 19 2005 9:30PM GMT Offers Neighborly Advice
Direct News Oct 19 2005 3:05PM GMT
More of Online Ad Budgets Go to Local Sites
MarketingVOX Oct 19 2005 2:43PM GMT
Best time for e-commerce: noon EST, best ad click-throughs: lunch and early evening
ZDNet Oct 19 2005 1:47PM GMT
Yahoo Reports Revenue Gains Bolstered by Online Ads
New York Times Oct 19 2005 10:23AM GMT
Should SEOs Recommend or Implement Optimization Changes?
Search Engine Guide Oct 18 2005 4:11PM GMT
Google Print project inspires fans, fears
USA Today Oct 18 2005 4:02PM GMT

Related reading

Simple Share Buttons