The State of the Search Engine Industry

Noted search engine experts and analysts explored the major themes and trends driving the current and future state of the industry in a lively, wide-ranging forum at the Search Engine Strategies conference.

A special report from the Search Engine Strategies 2003 Conference, August 18-21, San Jose, CA.

A longer version of this article with more comprehensive and detailed coverage of this analyst forum is available to Search Engine Watch members.
Click here to learn more about becoming a member

The Search Industry Analyst Roundtable was led by moderator Safa Rashtschy, a financial analyst at U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, who recently published an extensive report on search as a growing financial sector.

The controversial subject of paid inclusion started off the session, concerning the rising number of paid inclusion and XML-fed listings in a search engine’s supposedly non-paid listings. Panelist Greg Notess, editor of Search Engine Showdown said, “A lot of users have just assumed that people paid to get into the results. They’re largely unaware of the paid elements.”

Panelist Chris Sherman, editor of SearchDay, said, “I personally don’t think there’s any deception. The engines only see the abstract of the content [when viewing an XML feed”.” He continued, “The relevancy algorithms we have today may not work in the future when we have 500 billion pages, so maybe inclusion will be more necessary.”

“Google doesn’t need it,” said Danny Sullivan, the industry’s most well-known voice and editor of Search Engine Watch, also a panelist. “But, I do think that the paid versus unpaid issue is coming to a head.”

Brett Tabke of Webmaster World agreed. “The FTC or the government is going to have to look at it more closely,” he said.

Rashtschy switched subjects, asking the panelists if they thought there is an opportunity for specialized search and vertical search.

“Singingfish [multimedia search engine” came out of nowhere,” said Tabke. “So there could be other successes.”

Notess said, “Most of the vertical portals failed after the crash. Singingfish may be able to make it, along with health care and a few others. They need to balance between making money and having enough PR to educate the public about their resources. There is room for it – the general search engines might not work as well when the size of the Web grows.”

“Travel verticals are doing great,” Sherman concurred. “Expedia, Travelocity, for example. And the major commerce searches like Dealtime. Watch for more transaction oriented models like these to apply to other markets.”

The panel discussed the future of search as it relates to devices, such as phones, PDAs, and other non-PC hardware. All the panelists agreed that devices will continue to evolve as both an accessory and a necessity for users. Tabke said that he can run his entire operation from his pocket nowadays, reading his email en route from the airport, and updating his site via PDA from a wireless hot spot.

Sullivan suggested that most devices probably don’t really need a custom results set; rather, just a different format. He said that his experiences thus far in using his phone for search had been disappointing.

Rashtschy theorized that someday it will be possible to transmit a user’s location through a cell phone to Google automatically to take advantage of geo-search, to find relevant local information. Notess concurred, but said that for phones to really take off as a search device, other than to provide weather, directions and restaurant information, “We really need to change the habits of users. We need to build demand for geo-search, to teach users to search that way,” he said.

“Users need to get used to real-time transactions,” Rashtschy said. He gave a personal example of ordering books from Amazon on his phone while waiting in a doctor’s office.

The panelists were asked to weigh in with their own personal “wish lists” for the search engines, and also to prognosticate one year from now into the future of search.

Notess said, “As a librarian, I’d like to see truncation and proximity locators built into search. One year from now, I think we’ll still see Google as the industry search leader.”

Sherman said he is a big fan of personalization, but would like the ability to override it in a search environment. He agrees that Google will still have the strongest mindshare and leadership next year. “But it’s Google’s game to lose now,” he said, “and it’s not unforeseeable.”

“I’d like to see a subscription service for an ad-free search environment,” said Tabke. “I’d also like to see personalization, saved searches, and more ‘related searches’ like Teoma does.” One year from now? “We’ll still be talking about, ‘What’s Microsoft going to do?’ We’ve been saying that for five years now. I think that IBM is the one to watch.”

Sullivan wants specialty database and search engines that “read my mind,” he said. Next year, he said he thinks it will be status quo, although “There is still room for a new player. Google got where it is today by being good, when all the others were so bad.”

Dana Todd is a founding partner of SiteLab International Inc. She obsesses on the flagrant misuse of the apostrophe because of her journalism and advertising background. She is a frequent speaker on Internet marketing topics, including search engine strategies and link-buying.

A longer version of this article with more comprehensive and detailed coverage of this analyst forum is available to Search Engine Watch members.
Click here to learn more about becoming a member

Search Headlines

NOTE: Article links often change. In case of a bad link, use the publication’s search facility, which most have, and search for the headline.

AU search engine takes aim at Google
ZDNet Australia Oct 22 2003 1:44AM GMT
The Web: Search engines still evolving
UPI Oct 22 2003 0:17AM GMT
Fumbling fingers drive VeriSign traffic surge
CNET Oct 21 2003 8:22PM GMT
Yahoo Japan profit doubles
CNET Oct 21 2003 6:58PM GMT
Google Further ‘Defines’ Search Oct 21 2003 3:34PM GMT
FindWhat profits up as Espotting saga goes on
Netimperative Oct 21 2003 11:29AM GMT
Yahoo Launches Anti-Spam E-Mail Decoys
Boston Globe Oct 21 2003 10:23AM GMT
Australian Mooter takes on Google
ZDNet Oct 21 2003 9:39AM GMT
Court forces domain name scammers to quit Oct 21 2003 9:21AM GMT
Network boasts a change of address
CNET Oct 20 2003 10:16PM GMT
Domain names and the threat to the Net
MSNBC Oct 20 2003 9:38PM GMT
Movielink Teams with Lycos for Co-Branded Site
Boston Globe Oct 20 2003 7:48PM GMT
Trigg joins Yahoo in sales boost
Netimperative Oct 20 2003 12:38PM GMT
powered by

Related reading

Simple Share Buttons