A longer version of this article that goes
When I need a local product or service, I get low-tech but efficient. I pull the yellow pages off my bookshelf. Within a few minutes, I’ve found companies that can meet my needs.
Surely web-wide search engines ought to be just as efficient at finding local commercial information! Sadly, no. I’ve always found that searching the web for local commerce results is often a disappointing experience.
Fortunately, there are signs that local search is about to get better. Overture is testing a local search product, while Google is beta testing its new Search By Location service. In addition, long-time local search player CitySearch is expanding its efforts. These developments and others could mean that I’ll stop reaching for that printed yellow pages in the future — and so might you.
In this article, we’ll take a closer look at the problem with local searching in general, in terms of general purpose web search engines. Then we’ll examine Overture’s moves in the local space. Part 2 and Part 3 look at the work Google, CitySearch and others are doing.
Before looking forward, let’s see a few examples of how local commerce searching can be a poor experience on the web’s major search engines. We’ll start with a search for san francisco dentist on Google.
When I tried this recently, the number one ranked listing “San Francisco Dentist Directory” looked promising but turned out to have no listings at all. Instead, it was just a shell for listings that may or may not come in the future. The same was true for a top listed page from the “Internet Yellow Pages World Wide.” Another top listed page from a cosmetics site purported to show information about “San Francisco Cosmetic Dentist.” Instead, it merely provided links to a variety of non-San Francisco, non-dental cosmetic sites.
What’s wrong here? Unlike with yellow pages, there’s no cost involved with getting listed in Google’s web search results. Consequently, there’s no natural barrier preventing anyone from trying to get a top ranking, regardless of whether they actually have content relevant for that term.
This issue is true with any type of search done on the web. People try to spam and game the search engines for all types of traffic. But local search is more susceptible to spam, I feel, because link analysis doesn’t work well to prevent bad content from winning top results.
There are fewer people creating links about the topic of “san francisco dentists,” which in turn means Google has to depend more on other, more old-fashioned and spam-susceptible means of ranking, such as the location and frequency of terms on the pages themselves.
Not Just Google’s Problem
I singled out Google, but it’s hardly the only search engine with below par results. I searched for san francisco dentist at Ask Jeeves. The same disappointing “San Francisco Dentist Directory” page that was number one at Google was also number one with Ask’s “Web Results” (which are powered by Ask Jeeves-owned Teoma). That page also got top ranked by AllTheWeb.
Also notable was a Sport Illustrated article that came up from eLibrary.com in the results at both Ask Jeeves and Inktomi. The article was a profile of a high-tech yo-yo expert who is also a dentist in San Francisco. Aside from not being relevant, the listing also stood out because it’s present through paid inclusion deals with both search engines. So, even adding a cost barrier is no guarantee of relevancy of local commerce search.
To be fair, mixed in among these disappointments are indeed some dentists actually based in San Francisco. However, the lists are not comprehensive. Nor do they deal with the issue of localities being near each other. For example, someone living in the Southern California city of Newport Beach might be also interested in dentists in nearby Huntington Beach and Costa Mesa. Unfortunately, there’s no easy way to automatically have these appear.
Mapping is another issue to be addressed. Want a hotel in San Francisco? Personally, I head over to Expedia. I know the travel booking site will give me results that really are hotels. I also get matches on a map, making it easy for me to discover what’s near a particular area of the city where I may want to stay. Do that on a regular search engine? No way. Well, at least not yet.
Overture Goes Local
In September, I mentioned that Overture had unveiled a glimpse of its long-awaited local search listings on its Overture Research site, producing a flurry of articles that followed. Overture’s since shut down that preview, saying it was primarily being used to test some of its mapping technology.
Instead, the flagship for Overture’s local search product is now on Overture-owned AltaVista. A random sample of surfers going there, about 10 percent, have been tagged with cookies and now may encounter local search results when they do relevant queries, Overture says.
For example, if you were in the sample group and doing a search for “san francisco dentists,” you would see a special “Local Sponsored Matches” section at the top of your results. Within this area would be links to some paid advertisers targeting that that phrase, plus you’d be able to click to see even more local results.
Choosing to see more brings up a familiar top ten list of local results. However, the listings are also mapped visually across the city of San Francisco. The map lets you interactively change the listings displayed. Zoom out, and Overture understands you want to see listings relevant to the San Francisco Bay Area, rather than just within the city itself. Click on the bottom of the map, and your listings move southward. All this happens without needing to enter any new city names, helpful especially if you don’t know the names of surrounding cities.
Who’s in these local listings? Not ordinary Overture advertisers. For example, you won’t find any of the listings in local search that come up for a regular search on Overture for san francisco dentist.
Instead, Overture has a separate database of listings that involves a small number of its US national advertisers taking part in a pilot program. Additional “backfill” results are also provided by yellow pages and data provider Acxiom.
Why not involve all the existing Overture listings? One reason is that the program is still being tested. However, a key issue is that those in the local program need to provide physical addresses to be associated with their listings. Without these, the listings cannot be mapped, a key part of the local product.
Going Live With Overture Local
Overture expects its yet-to-be-named local product to open to any advertiser in the next several months. When that happens, there will obviously be some queries lacking listings. To avoid disappointing searchers, Overture will partner with a yellow pages company to provide “backfill” answers for when it has no paid local listings of its own. A contract with a firm for this has been finalized, but Overture’s not yet releasing the name.
As for how and when local search goes live with partners — and even who those partners will be — that’s all still being negotiated.
“We’re in active discussions with all existing and some potentially new partners. There’s a lot of interest and a lot of demand. We’re not disclosing specific partners that have yet signed up,” said John Ellis, senior director of market strategy with Overture.
It’s important to remember that the AltaVista implementation does not reflect what other partners may do. For example, a partner might decide to show all local results rather than just a few, when there is confidence that the query is local in nature.