You must use the four types of navigational linking, main, footer, breadcrumb, and secondary/supplemental. A few examples include non-www.versions of site pages as well as duplicateindex pages. You want to show the search engines that you're an...
Search engines simply see this as 20 versions of the same content, resulting in 19 variations being pushed to the supplementalindex -- never to be seen again. However, if all the versions refer to the Euro for pricing or the same phone number in...
He referred to Sitemaps as a "fast track to the supplementalindex". They didn't want this duplicate site indexed by the search engines, so they implemented a robots.txt as follows: When search engines don't index pages on your site, invest your...
Talk about a fast track to the supplementalindex. DuplicateContent. It's a common misperception that duplicatecontent is defined as two pages with identical content. Search engines immediately diagnose these pages as duplicatecontent.
Bring up the topic of the SupplementalIndex and duplicatecontent, the story gets even juicier. Does it mean I'm really in the SupplementalIndex or possibly banned for life? Is this the sign of a stronger "duplicatecontent" filter?
It seems that more Web sites are ending up with pages in Google's supplementalindex lately. Having urls in the supplemental results doesn't mean that you have some sort of penalty at all; the main determinant of whether a url is in our main web...
This can cause consumer confusion, along with the fact that duplicatecontent is eventually filtered out of the search engines main results and relegated to supplemental results at best. At worst, the content is booted out of the search engine...
Google is also not saying how often the supplementalindex will be refreshed. In addition to the new supplementalindex, the normal monthly refresh is slowly replaced with a continuous crawl of many documents.