SEO News

Diller: Ask Jeeves Might Get New Name

by , Comments

According to this story, Barry Diller told attendees at the D3 -- All Things Digital conference that he is condering a name change. Of course, this also assumes that the IAC/Ask Jeeves merger goes through.

Ask Jeeves has been doing some great during the past several years but for many people, who haven't taken a look at what they've been up to, their name has negative connotations about what Jeeves was liked in the late 1990's.

In other words, memories of bad search experiences does not help the company in trying to get people to take a look and hopefully use what they're developing.

When Diller was asked what names he and his team are considering, he told the audience:

"Might be one of those words [Ask or Jeeves] without the other," Diller answered, adding that the final decision on AskJeeves' new name isn't "finalized."

Hmm. I'm far from a marketing expert but "Jeeves" by itself would be no better than what they have now. would seem to make sense. Instead of searching for an answer, one would "ask" for an answer. How polite.

Of course, they could also try to capitalize on their competitors names. How does Yaheeves or Jeevoogle sound. (-;

Postscript: If Barry Diller and crew want to turn Ask Jeeves into they're going to have to acquire the domain name (it's not like that Mr. Diller doesn't have the money or the lawyers) from someone in Minnesota.

The page that's visible at today has been online since 2003.

Btw, is registered to a company in New York City and to a person in Virginia.

ClickZ Live San Francisco This Year's Premier Digital Marketing Event is #CZLSF
ClickZ Live San Francisco (Aug 11-14) will bring together the industry's leading online marketing practitioners to deliver 4 days of educational sessions and training workshops. From Data-Driven Marketing to Social, Mobile, Display, Search and Email, the comprehensive agenda will help you maximize your marketing efforts and ROI. Register today!

Recommend this story

comments powered by Disqus