My favorite passage from the article is the same one that JB used on Searchblog. He calls it the "choice quote." I agree.
Mr. [Allan] Adler [a vice president for legal and governmental affairs at the Association of American Publishers]said Google's contention that its search program might somehow increase sales of books was speculation at best.
"When people make inquiries using Google's search engine and they come up with references to books, they are just as likely to come to this fine institution to look up those references as they are to buy them," he said, referring to the Public Library.
To which Google's Mr. Drummond [Google's general counsel] replied, "Horrors."
Btw, an archived version of the debate (audio only) is available here. Video is coming soon.
You'll need QuickTime to listen.
Also, kudos to the NY Times reporter for pointing out something that we've blogged about many times when it comes to material found in the Google Book Search database that HAS been scanned from a library and is still considered in-copyright:
Successful searches will return only three to five lines of text, which the company says constitutes a "fair use," allowed under copyright law.
Last Week to Save on SES London Tickets!
Learn to engage customers and increase ROI by distributing your online marketing efforts across paid, owned & earned media. Join the leaders of today's digital marketing & advertising industry at SES London. Find out more ››
*Saver Rates expire this Friday, Dec 13.