If you are a blogger in the US your life is about to change big-time.
You have just entered the Twilight Zone...
New FTC guidelines (read full version) described in the official press release state:
1 - "the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement. Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service."
and
2 - the revised Guides reflect Commission case law and clearly state that both advertisers and endorsers may be liable for false or unsubstantiated claims made in an endorsement - or for failure to disclose material connections between the advertiser and endorsers. The revised Guides also make it clear that celebrities have a duty to disclose their relationships with advertisers when making endorsements outside the context of traditional ads, such as on talk shows or in social media."
My reading of this is very disturbing.
Here is a possible scenario:
To try to regulate bloggers as if they were professional journalists or compensated endorsements is asinine (incidentally - these guidelines do not apply to professional journalists!) The FTC is trying a land-grab into Internet regulation so they can extend their bureaucratic tentacles and justify their continued existence and funding. All of this is being done under the slogan of their official tagline "Protecting America's Consumers". This of course begs the questions - "from whom?"
This is a screwy world we live in, but the whole premise of blogging on the Internet is predicated on the notion that anyone can have frank and open discussions about any topic of their choosing. Most bloggers do not get paid and do not make any money directly or indirectly from their blogging efforts. They try to build their reputation and disseminate information that their followers may find useful. They never claim to be "objective" and often hold very strong, peculiar, and very personal opinions.
It has always been "buyer beware" on the Internet. I don't think anyone needs to be reminded that we should carefully consider the source and reputation of any information that we encounter online. We certainly don't need a chilling effect on the whole online conversation from a huge government agency.
It is ironic that this is happening under the direction of a man who was elected with the strong support of the Internet community and specifically active social media leaders. Unfortunately typical liberal-leaning tendencies are also to regulate people's lives via the government in order to protect them against unscrupulous big-business practices.
Don't get me wrong - frankly I don't care if the assault on individual liberties comes from the left or right (the four FTC commissioners who voted unanimously for the new guideline were all appointed by Bush). But I do care when big brother injects themselves into normal Internet discourse this heavy-handedly.
Fight this unconstitutional over-reach - these are simply regulations from unelected bureaucrats within the executive branch.
Let's make our voices heard and protect the First Amendment and our ability to have unfettered discourse without fear of lawsuits online.
BTW - no one paid me to "endorse" this position on the new FTC regulations - I guess that my butt is now legally covered (at least for this blog post).
Posted by Tim Ash at 7:12 PM | Permalink | Comments (12)
One of our very own SEW experts, Tim Ash is featured on the cover of the summer edition of Online Strategy Magazine. In it, he talks about the short attention span of web users and how too much copy or flashy graphics can detract from conversion goals.
These are things Tim has learned as a landing page consultant. And in your gut, you know he's right. You skim web pages. You abandon pages that are difficult to navigate easily. You don't feel like reading a dissertation about a new pair of shoes. Do they look good? Yes. Where's the "Add to Cart" button?
You might think it strange for a copywriter and blogger such as myself to even talk about the idea that there can be such a thing as too much copy. After all, we copywriters often charge by the word. More words = more money. (Even when we charge by the hour, longer copy means more hours = more $.)
But I have a confession to make. I know you have a short attention span. I know you're probably skimming this post right now. Many of you comment without reading the entire post you're commenting on.
I know that I need to bust out 125-250 words to attract the Googlebot while making copy work with the design and also use my magical psychological powers to compel you to click the purchase button.
I like to use bullet points (when clients allow, which is sadly not often enough) and get straight to the point because I assume that readers are smart and don't need every nuanced point explained to them.
Of course, you know what they say about assuming.
That's why landing page testing is so crucial. Don't just assume your assumptions are correct. Test them. Develop pages designed around best practices and then test, test, TEST!
Despite all of the above, there are still some niches where a good deal of copy is necessary. Generally, the higher the price or the commitment involved in a purchasing decision, the more education a consumer will want. They get their desired information through copy. But even then, there could be niches where a busy businessman simply wants someone to call them. He'd rather chat it out and then decide. That's when short copy and a contact form might be needed instead.
The only way you'll know for sure is through landing page testing. I can't emphasize this enough. Yes, analytics are good. Yes, keeping an eye on your campaigns are good. But you won't know if you could squeeze even more money out your ad campaigns until you test.
Posted by Nathania Johnson at 3:49 PM | Permalink | Comments (11)
SEO copywriting can be a misleading term. Too often, writers will get stuck on the SEO part and lose sight of the other, more important goal: creating a good user experience. In today's Web analytics and ROI column, "Training Your Content Developers on SEO Copywriting," Eric Enge offers advice on how to teach your copywriters to create quality content, which will also rank in search engines.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 1:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Whether it's organic page titles and meta descriptions or PPC ads, it's your job, as someone who's seeking a conversion, to deliver what you promised. In today's small business search engine marketing column, "Making the Most of Search Engine Copywriting," Carrie Hill explains that small business owners must be aware of what their ad copy promises, and how they deliver on those promises.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Content. It's become the mantra for SEOs, and the standard advice for all site owners, regardless of the Web space they're in. In today's enterprise search marketing column, "Content? Content. Content!," Aaron Shear explains that it's high time we review the advantages of content, and where it may be applicable.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
Fresh content will help you achieve top rankings right away, and help your Web site become an "authority" site. But fresh rankings don't always last. In today's Organic Search Engine Optimization column, "Combine Freshness and Links for Long-Term Results," Mark Jackson shows you how to create a concerted effort to generate links and traffic to the post, and keep those rankings long-term.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink | Comments (0)
USA Today recently asked Google's Matt Cutts for tips to help sites rank in their search engine. Cutts offered up 5 tips plus a word of advice in implementing the tips. Here they are:
And that word of advice? Don't overdo it. In other words, don't stuff your pages full of keywords.
What do you think of Cutts' advice? Leave a comment!
Posted by Nathania Johnson at 10:13 AM | Permalink | Comments (48)
If you're focused on ranking for that one major keyword, having a deep Web site full of great content is necessary to achieve authority in the eyes of the search engine. In today's Organic Search Engine Optimization column, "Should Your SEO Strategy Target the Head or the Long Tail?," Mark Jackson shows that, whether or not you intended to do it, you'll be optimizing for the long tail in order to achieve your goals.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink
Combining both technological know-how and a strong command of the written word, agency SEO copywriters are the front-line troops of any SEO initiative. In today's SEM Agency Issues column, "The SEO Copywriter: Wordsmithing the Web," William Flaiz writes an ode to these front-line troops of any SEO initiative.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink
You can waste a lot of time debating whether content is king. For the sake of argument, let's just all agree so we can focus on business decisions. In today's Vertical Challenge column, "Content Creation: About Journey, Not Destination? - Part 2," travel search expert Elisabeth Osmeloski discusses the pros and cons of hiring an in-house staff to transform your travel site.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink
Duplicate content can be a huge challenge for SEOs and their clients. But what qualifies as duplicate content? In today's au Natural column, "The Perils of Duplicate Content," Mark Jackson runs through five of the more common forms.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink
Is creating content really the cornerstone of SEO? If so, do you pay your writers, or do you expect them to write for free? In today's Vertical Challenge column, "Content Creation: About Journey, Not Destination?," travel search expert Elisabeth Osmeloski lays out the options, including the road less traveled.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink
In today's au Natural column, "Reach Today's Search Users With Long-Tail Optimization," Mark Jackson discusses the evolution born of necessity which has led search users to come so far in such a short time. He tells you how you can reach today's educated search engine user by optimizing for the long tail.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 12:00 AM | Permalink
When you're creating content for SEO purposes, there's clearly a difference in the quality of that content on a site-by-site or even a day-to-day basis. Some content is good, and will contribute to a site's overall visibility in the SERPs and garner some inbound links.
What's it take to go a step beyond good content to make great content? P.J. Fusco discusses this in her ClickZ column today, noting that the difference is in the conversions. Great content is action-oriented, inspiring users to make a purchase, request more information, sign up for a newsletter, make a reservation, or set up an appointment.
She offers some tips on following a "good-better-best" process of optimization, and examining what your content actually communicates.
Posted by Kevin Newcomb at 9:36 AM | Permalink
Keyword research is one of the most important aspects of creating a successful search marketing campaign, regardless if you're working on organic optimization or sponsored listings. Yet many search marketers treat keyword research as an afterthought or drudgework. It needn't be—keyword research tools can both speed up the process and provide a richer pallette for search marketers to work with. In SearchDay today and tomorrow, longtime Search Engine Strategies keyword research panelist Christine Churchill takes a look at two very powerful tools. Today's article, Next-Gen Keyword Research Tools, takes an in-depth look at Trellian's Keyword Discovery tool. Tomorrow: Hitwise's Search Intelligence Tool.
Posted by Chris Sherman at 3:17 AM | Permalink
The New York Times has one of the most popular news web sites, but until this year that was largely because of the strength of its brand. After its acquisition of About.com, the Times embarked on an aggressive campaign to make its web site more search friendly, a complex process that's paid off with notable traffic gains for the company. Today's SearchDay article, Getting The New York Times More Search Engine Friendly, takes a look behind the scenes at how the Times and its vice president of enterprise search, Marshall Simmonds, pulled it off.
Posted by Chris Sherman at 5:48 AM | Permalink
Yesterday, Bill Slawski wrote about some of the issues with duplicate content and how it can hurt your rankings. Todd Malicoat (aka Stuntdubl) followed up Bill's analysis with some solutions for duplicate content issues. The combination of Bill's and Todd's posts make for the most recent and comprehensive duplicate content guide I have possibly ever seen. Both are worth a read:
+ Duplicate Content Issues and Search Engines by Bill Slawski + How to Remedy Duplicate Content and Magical % Thinking by Todd Malicoat
Posted by Barry Schwartz at 8:53 AM | Permalink
A paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Extending Database Technology conference in Munich near the end of March, Indexing Shared Content in Information Retrieval Systems (pdf), jointly authored by employees of Yahoo, Google, and IBM, discusses how to limit index sizes of search engines by reducing the amount of duplicate content contained in their indexes.
After reading it, I started considering and listing some of the problems that sites may have that could cause search engines to not index the pages of those sites, or display them in search results. My list is in a post at SEO by the Sea, titled Duplicate Content Issues and Search Engines.
Posted by Bill Slawski at 10:37 AM | Permalink
Chris Boggs over at the Search Engine Roundtable wrote an item named Which Came First: the Content or the Plagiarism? which discusses the challenge search engines face when it comes to determining the original source of a particular piece of content.
For example, the content I am writing right now may be picked up within a matter of seconds by another site that wants to "borrow" or steal the content. So now we have two (probably a lot more than two) sources with identical content. A search engine can say, hey, I found source A before I found source B with this particular content, so source A must be the original source. But if you think about that, since spiders don't work in real time, a search engine may visit the source that "borrowed" the content prior to visiting the original source of that content.
Chris offers two suggestions. The first is to watch your crawl cycles in Google and wait just before to post the content. Now that is not really feasible, as Chris knows, because there is no way to exactly know when Google will crawl your site and news information must be posted as soon as possible, so waiting is normally not an option. Chris uses this example to make a point, I believe. The other option Chris suggests is to use Google Sitemaps, so Google can see you as a trusted source and be feed the information, sooner than later.
But what do you think is the algorithmic solution? I personally do not know. There are people discussing the fundamental challenge at Search Engine Roundtable Forums.
Posted by Barry Schwartz at 9:29 AM | Permalink
This Boring Headline Is Written for Google is an interesting look from the New York Times about how newspapers are learning to adapt to search engines, in particular to ensure headlines are targeted toward using terms that people are searching for, rather than grabbing attention but being non-descriptive.
I talked with Steve Lohr for the article. Part of me feels for the journalists who might believe that being search engine friendly means having boring headlines. But then again, it's also about the context.
When I'm reading a newspaper, a catchy, funny headline might be what I need to pull me into a story. And I do love a good headline. But if I'm keyword searching for news, I know what I'm after. Your catchy headline isn't what pulls me in. Your headline using the terms I searched for is what will do it.
Of course, plenty read news by browsing articles online through their own feedreaders or news aggregators such as Google News and Yahoo News. Funny, enticing headlines are still important in these places.
Also, SEO is not entirely the "chess game" of manipulation that Steve talks about in the articles. We're talking basic content search engine optimization here. Having good titles for pages has been a top SEO tip for a decade. It's not as strong as factor as it once was, but it's still very important and one the search engines themselves tell you to do.
Calling having good titles to be manipulation is like saying you're manipulating people looking for books by giving them good descriptive titles. It's not manipulation. It's a core competency for any web publisher and one that amazingly enough still continues to be ignored by many.
Want to comment or discuss? Visit our SEW Forums thread, SEO & Newspapers.
Posted by Danny Sullivan at 9:00 AM | Permalink
ClickZ links to a great undercover project by the Wall Street Journal named Our Columnist Creates Web 'Original Content' But Is in for a Surprise. The article is written by a columnist that went under cover, and was hired by Web "publishers" that want so-called "original content" for ranking well in search engines. The writer explains how he was hired to write 50 articles, each 500 words long for a total sum of $100. In the end, the "publisher" wanted plagiarized copy for his 50 articles.
To make a long story short, he spent days researching and writing one article, sent it to the client, who said it was written well, but wanted to break up his original article into smaller more keyword phrase specific articles. The client sent an example of an article to the WSJ columnist, who noticed that it was plagiarized not from one site, but several well-respect sites, including World Health Organization, New Scientist and WebMD sites. The client wanted the columnist to flip around from site to site and copy pieces of content from popular sites, and paste them together to make "original content."
All in all, he blames the search engines for allowing this. He provides the following analogy; "In fact, search engines are more like a TV camera crew let loose in the middle of a crowd of rowdy fans after a game. Seeing the camera, everyone acts boorishly and jostles to get in front. The act of observing something changes it."
To be fair, I just wrote an article this morning at the Search Engine Roundtable named Writing Articles That Get Links. I explain in that article that the copy-writing for search engines is getting old and will eventually be figured out by the search engines. For articles, today, to get links, to rank well, they must be written with soul and emotion. You have to care about what you are writing for people to want to link to them. You see these patterns happening at Google today. Of course there are hundreds of examples of pages that catch the long-tail of search terms that are plagiarized - but you will notice (1) less and less of this in the future (2) and/or longer-tailed keywords being targeted with these articles. Both of which reduce the likelihood of a searcher locating such articles.
Posted by Barry Schwartz at 9:39 AM | Permalink
Along with the cool new robots.txt checker, Google Sitemaps has also released stats showing the most common words used on pages within your web site and the most common words anchor text pointing at your site.
The common words in site content stats will be good fodder for those who believe Google somehow tries to figure out a word "theme" for your entire site. Google's never claimed to do this before -- and seeing sites like Amazon or Wikipedia rank for anything when they are about nothing in particular should demonstrate that you don't need to target all your pages around a particular term or theme.
Still, if Google's generating stats like this for a site, it'll probably tip some people back to worry more about this. I wouldn't - but do as you deem best.
The anchor text analysis is far more intriguing. Again, Google has generally said that each page is measured by the links pointing at that particular page. So if someone points at a deep page in your site, that helps that particular deep page, not the site as a whole. And if someone points at your home page, that helps the home page, not the entire site (Yahoo, in contrast, has said it does some sitewide link crediting).
Now Google's reporting anchor text terms for an entire site -- which suggests that any link to any page in your site might have an impact on other pages. Or not!
Questions, questions. I'll drop a word over to Google blogmeister Matt Cutts to see about getting some answers. I'll postscript here, but I'd also say to watch his blog as well.
Finally, while these stats are promised, I don't see them live for all of my sites my sitemaps yet. If you don't as well, there's probably a delay in getting them rolled out and live.
Posted by Danny Sullivan at 8:24 PM | Permalink
One of the first things anyone embarking on a search marketing effort learns is that effective selection and use of keywords can make or break a campaign. Keyword research is an art, but the appropriate use of tools can help you practice the art much more effectively.
The folks who offer Wordtracker, one of the most popular keyword research tools, invited a number of search marketing experts to contribute their thoughts in a guide to keyword research that they're making freely available. I've got a review of the guide in today's SearchDay article, An Experts' Guide to Keyword Research.
Posted by Chris Sherman at 8:55 AM | Permalink
The first day of the WebmasterWorld Search & Marketing Conference 2005 in New Orleans happened yesterday, and Barry Schwartz from Search Engine Roundtable and Aaron Wall from SEO Book have logged reports. A recap of search-related sessions:
Keynote - The Search, by John Battelle from Search Engine Roundtable covers John Battelle's keynote, in particular how he sees search as the main driver of the second evolution of the web, or Web 2.0. Webmaster World New Orleans Pubcon - John Battelle Keynote has SEO Book's write-up of the talk in nice, bullet-point fashion.
Contextual Advertising for Publishers from SER covers ways of getting more out of AdSense plus how contextual ad delivery is done in general.
Local Search - Issues and Opportunities from SER covers what people look for in local search, info on small business take-up, MSN Search talking about its new local product and Ask Jeeves on its largely Citysearch-powered service.
Peaceful Coexistence - Writing for the Engines from SER on things to consider in writing content for a site that you hope will help it do better with search engines and avoiding duplicate content issues. SEO Book has its own coverage here.
Lead Generation & Tracking & Shopping Search - Getting Listed, Getting Traffic from SER covers tips on tracking and dealing with shopping search.
Competitive Intelligence from SEO Book looks at was to understand what your competitors are doing and ways to mess with their heads.
Posted by Danny Sullivan at 6:32 AM | Permalink
Posted by Danny Sullivan at 10:50 AM | Permalink